Skip Navigation
 
This table is used for column layout.
 
PZC Minutes 02-28-2012
MEMBERS PRESENT:        Patrick Kennedy, William Carroll, Mario Marrero, Kevin Foley and Viney Wilson, Bart Pacekonis
ALTERNATES PRESENT:  William Butter sitting for Elizabeth Kuehnel
STAFF PRESENT:          Michele Lipe, Town Planner
                
APPLICATIONS TO BE OFFICIALLY RECEIVED:
Appl 12-06P, Dynamic Fitness Facility—request for a Special Exception to Table 4.1.1.A for a personal fitness studio at 1257 John Fitch Boulevard, Bay A and B, I zone.
Appl 12-07P, FTS USA – request for a special exception to Section 4.4.5.E and site plan modification to allow a 1,500 sf of outdoor storage area for telecommunications equipment, on property located at 401 Chapel Road, I-291 Interstate Corridor Development zone
Appl 12-08P, Laflamme Detached Accessory Apartment – request for a special exception to section 7.7 and site plan approval for a detached accessory apartment on property located at 1891Main Street, A-40 zone  
Appl 12-09P, Ticket Network Site Plan – request for a site plan modification to add a temporary gravel parking lot for 70 vehicles, on property located at 83 Gerber Road, I zone
Appl 12-10P, Tyler Regional Animal Care Shelter – request for a special exception to 4.1.1 Municipal Facilities and Uses and site plan of development for a regional animal care shelter, on property located at 124 Sullivan Ave., RC zone
PUBLIC HEARING/COUNCIL CHAMBERS

1.      Appl 12-06P, Dynamic Fitness Facility—request for a Special Exception to Table 4.1.1.A for a personal fitness studio at 1257 John Fitch Boulevard, Bays A and B, I zone.
Kevin Charbonneau presented the application.
Lipe provided the following planning report.
Request for Special Exception to Article 7.13 of the zoning regulations to allow a personal training fitness facility in the existing building at 1257 John Fitch Boulevard, Bays A and B, I zone. The Fitness studio will occupy about 3,600 sq ft.
Special exception criteria for indoor recreational use include:
  • The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Plan of Conservation and Development.
  • The application has met the requirements of the zoning regulations.
  • The land is physically suited to the proposed use.
  • Minimal, if any, adverse environmental impacts are created.
  • No traffic or other hazards will be created.
  • The impacts on the capacity of the present and proposed utilities, street, drainage systems, sidewalks, and other elements of the infrastructure will be minimal.
  • There will be minimal or no adverse effects on existing uses in the area.
  • Surrounding property values will be conserved.
  • The character of the neighborhood will be maintained or minimally disrupted.
  • The general welfare of the community will be served.
  • There is a balance between neighborhood acceptance and community needs.
  • Historic factors are adequately protected; or due consideration to preservation of historic factors has been demonstrated.
  • The overall physical appearance of the proposed development is compatible with surrounding development and the Commission’s goals for the neighborhood/corridor.
  • The architectural design is aesthetically pleasing and blends well into the surrounding area.
The Commission may impose additional conditions in accordance with these regulations in order to ensure that all applicable criteria enumerated above and/or within a particular use category are satisfied.
The applicant is proposing approx. 6 classes a week with maximum class size at 30 – but more typical to have about 20 students.  Classes typically run during evening.  
The parking requirement for indoor recreational use is one space per 250 sq ft, or 15 spaces. The applicant is showing 32 spaces and 2 handicap space dedicated for this unit.  There is additional parking available on the southerly side of the site and typically the classes take place after the industrial users have left for the day.
The site is served by public water and sewer.
The Fire Marshal has reviewed this application and his requirements have been satisfied.  The Environmental Health Officer has requested that a copy of their license that has been issued by the CT Dept of Consumer Protection be provided to the Health Department.
If this application is approved, the Planning Dept requests no additional approval modifications.
There was public participation in favor and in opposition to the application. Commissioners had questions.  
The public hearing for Appl. 12-06P, Dynamic Fitness Facility closed at 7:38 PM.

REGULAR MEETING-MADDEN ROOM
CALL TO ORDER: 7:40PM
PUBLIC PARTICIPATON: None
NEW BUSINESS:
  • Appl 12-06P, Dynamic Fitness Facility—request for a Special Exception to Table 4.1.1.A for a personal fitness studio at 1257 John Fitch Boulevard, Bays A and B, I zone
Commissioner Wilson made a motion to approve Appl 12-06P, Dynamic Fitness Facility with the following modifications:
  • All building signs require the insurance of a sign permit before they are erected.
  • License issued by consumer protection must be submitted to the Health Department.
Commissioner Pacekonis seconded the motion.  The motion carried and the vote was unanimous.  

  • Appl 11-22P, Neary Interior Lot – request for approval of a site restoration plan to resolve a pending zoning violation related to the site plan approval granted on 6/16/11 (Exhibit A)
Commissioner Foley recused himself from this item.
Attorney Joe Williams from Shipman Goodwin in Hartford represented Greg and Rose Neary and explained the planting and grading proposal.  The plan proposed is to address the order that Mr. Neary received from Zoning Enforcement Officer and to address concerns raised by the Wetlands Officer related to a wetland disturbance on site.

Regarding the interior lot, Mr. Neary plans to build a retirement home to support his wife who needs to move out of their current house. The late October snowstorm caused significant tree damage. Neary’s contractor was instructed to remove damaged trees off the lot. He was concerned with the safety of his grandchildren. Spending money towards tree removal instead of towards his retirement home is not something he wanted to do, and he is not happy with the way it looks. Neary desired adequate screening and buffering. He always planned to replace the downed trees with adequate buffering. The tree removal project was almost complete when Neary was contacted by the Planning Department in December, and he promptly submitted a change order. He then received a cease-and-desist order and immediately complied. J.R. Russo was hired to prepare the planting plan, and Neary never intended and does not concede that he has violated the plot plan. He does not intend to appeal the violation. Town wetlands map showed no wetlands on the property. Jeff Folger, the town’s wetlands officer saw a small area of probable wetlands in the southeastern section of property. Neary hired a licensed soil scientist and agreed to put extensive wetland planting and seeding in wetland area.

The plan shows two rows of trees and erosion and sedimentation controls and berm to prevent storm water runoff. Neary asks for consideration to putting in a cedar fence on north and eastern property lines. If fence is approved, he asks to do less on trees if it accomplishes same purpose as trees to be planted. Engineering proposed white pines, and Neary would like to plant a different type of plant, Thuja Green Giant aka Green Emerald. It will grow as quick as white pines to replace buffering and screening. It grows 3-5 ft. per year, 20-40 feet in height and 8-12 feet in width.

Attorney Williams submitted a cut sheet of the evergreen tree for the record.

Lipe read into the record the wetlands report by Environmental Planner, Jeff Folger dated 3/7/12.

“A site walk of 1576 Main Street brought on by tree clearing activities in the same property revealed the presence of a wetland area in the southeast portion of the property.  The specific area was properly delineated by a qualified Soil Scientist and wad subsequently shown on a site plan by J. R. Russo and Assoc entitled “Grading and Planting Plan” Greg C. and Rose C. Neary.  Previously standing mature trees were completely removed from this area as well as from the 80-foot Upland Review Area adjacent to the wetland.  This activity constituted clear-cutting of trees, an activity that is regulated under section 4.3 of the Town of South Windsor Inland Wetland/Watercourse and Conservation Regulations and requires a permit by the Town prior to the initiation of such activity.  The clear-cutting of the trees in the wetland constituted a violation of the regulations

The removal of the vegetations caused a negative impact to the wetland by increasing evaporation within the area which could affect the hydrology of the wetland.  Wildlife habitat was also negatively affected by removing all existing vegetation.  Changing the surface condition from mature forest to an open field can increase the rate at which storm runoff travels along the site.  This can result in sediment impacts to the wetland and to adjacent properties as well.

When this was brought to Mr. Neary’s attention, he acknowledged the violation and agreed to include a mitigation plan that included the planting of wetland trees and shrubs to replace the plants that were cut down.  This planting is designed to replicate to a point the species that occurred there prior to the cutting.  Some of the red maple trees proposed were substituted to Weeping Willow trees.  These trees and herbaceous plant seed were chosen that would enhance groundwater uptake, provide a more diverse habitat for wildlife, and stabilize the soil to prevent erosion impacts to the wetland.  

Existing tree stumps within the wetland and the upland review area are to remain.  These should re-sprout and regenerate to further increase the vegetation within this area.

The initial grading plan was altered to include a small berm along the eastern property line to divert and direct runoff away from the neighboring property to the east.

Erosion controls are proposed to prevent sediment migration in to the wetland as well as protecting neighboring properties.

Based upon Mr. Neary’s response, I felt that the violation is being properly addressed and I did not issue a formal violation notice, but the Inland Wetland Commission has been apprised of the activities occurring on the property.

I am recommending that a bond of $2500.00 be submitted for establishment and maintenance of erosion controls and proper stabilization of the site.  An additional bond of $5000.00 is recommended to insure proper planting and establishment of the proposed wetland plantings.”

Lipe read into the record a Planning Report.

Request for approval of a grading and planting plan to resolve an alleged zoning violation that was issued as a result of the tree clearing that took place at the end of last year.
The site plan modification for the interior lot was approved in August of 2011.  The approved plan showed a proposed tree line indicating the existing trees that were to remain in site.  At that time, the proposed house was shown in an area that had minimal impact the existing houses.  
There are regulated wetlands on the site that have been disturbed with the tree cutting. The wetlands officer has reviewed the plans and has issued the following recommendation:
Erosion and Sedimentation bond in the amount of $2,500 and a wetlands planting bond in the amount of $5,000
If this plan is approved, the Planning Dept. requests that a Certificate of Zoning Compliance with this planting and grading plan be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Mylars of the final approved site plan modification as well as the grading and planting plan
Commissioners had questions and comments.

Commissioner Pacekonis mentioned that he drove by the site and looked at all of the removed trees. He was disappointed and wants to reconsider how to handle applications in the future when tree protection is desired. In the future, applicants should offer conservation easements. The property does not show too many trees standing, and it looks like a lot were cleared. The planting plan looks decent. He understands some of the trees were going to come down. Neary should have come to the Town to propose a plan because this was approved by a special exception.

Commissioner Kennedy mentioned there were only two cases like this. Remediation plans are expensive enough to keep people from cutting down trees. He agrees with Pacekonis but says the plan seems to address this issue.

Commissioner Wilson asked if the fence was going to be allowed as a buffer. Kennedy said the fence was not part of this application, and Neary would need a change order. Wilson would rather have trees in lieu of a fence. Kennedy restated that Neary may put in a change order in the future. Atty Williams said a cedar fence is sturdier at the lower levels than pine trees can be. Foley said trees would be better than a fence. Kennedy once again stated the fence is not part of this request.

Lipe mentioned that Staff and the Tree Warden will research to see if Neary’s proposed trees would be comparable to what a white pine would accomplish.

The public had questions and comments.

Norma Sanchez, 30 Oxbow Lane, spoke in opposition to the tree removal. They have no screening, and when they hired a surveyor, Neary’s tree removal crews were clearing area 6 feet into their property. Sanchez wants to know how they will be replaced.  She doesn’t feel the trees were cut due to damage. If a fence is proposed, she would like to know where it will be placed. How many trees will replaced, what kind and how long before they will provide screening? She would like to know where the berm will be placed and how high it will be and if it provides screening.

Roger Carchrie Feltus, 50 Paris Drive, said his house borders Neary’s property, and Neary’s property slopes toward his house. His major concern with all the work being done is water in cellar. The tree removal has caused his backyard to be mushy and wet. Arborvitae isn’t a good choice for replacement. Willow trees are invasive species and will enter neighbor’s yards. Cypress trees do well in swampy areas. The tree removal caused wildlife to disappear and changed the character of neighborhood. He is concerned about water running into his property and potential damage to his indoor pool.  He doesn’t like idea of a fence across the property line and questioned how tall a fence would be. He feels Mr. Neary should have to replace all the cut trees.

Steve Roback, 44 Oxbow Lane, asked if it was possible to have more trees planted and what the spacing of the trees will be.

Lipe responded that the spacing of the trees on the plan reflects 20 feet on center.

Roback asked if it was possible to add another row of trees along the northern and eastern end of the lot. He expressed concern that if the plan is approved what will be done to ensure Neary does not violate the plan?

Commissioner Kennedy responded that Neary has to follow his zoning approval. He cannot get a certificate of occupancy unless he is in accordance with the plan. There would be expensive legal proceedings for everyone concerned if he violates the zoning.

Roback was concerned about the allowed work hours on Neary’s property. Lipe said there is a noise ordinance controlled by the Police Department.

Commission Kennedy mentioned there occasionally are situations where getting the Tree Warden’s approval to remove trees is much less expensive than getting a violation for removing trees. Commissioner Pacekonis suggested that the plan should be corrected on which way north is.

Pat Colabrese, 11 Paris Drive, lives on the northeast corner of the presented plan. They can see into Neary’s bedroom window now. When this plan was originally approved, one of the questions concerned the removal of trees. Colabrese thanked the Commission for coming out to look at the lot and agrees that it is disappointing. The proposal shows the hillside goes into his house, and Colabrese is concerned that if it is pulled back, there will not be a wetlands there. The slope and grade will change causing the drainage to divert in a different direction. Eighty feet from northerly lot line, there is a significant drop. For the neighbors to north, small children cause a safety concern. If the grading is changed, Neary will take away the wetland area. Colabrese asked if there is recourse for removing 200 trees.

Lipe clarified that the Town Engineer has reviewed the grading plan and requested a berm to direct water to the wetland area. The certificate of occupancy would require the grading be adhered to as shown. It would also be subject to the Town Engineer’s approval.

Commissioners discussed whether the discussion should be tabled.

Commissioner Pacekonis felt after hearing the public speak that the discussion should be tabled and reconsidered for another meeting with everything on one plan.

Kennedy replied that the two things not on the application were the fence and different types of tree plantings. The question is what is really proposed here.

Commissioner Marrero asked if it is the practice for Town Engineer to bring in the public to give feedback if it affects neighbors. Lipe replied that they met onsite and discussed the drainage issues with the neighbors. Copies were sent to abutting neighbors. Marrero mentioned that the Town Engineer should explain the situation to the neighbors and asked if it is an extra step that can be done in this process.

Commissioner Pacekonis requested either Jeff Doolittle or Jeff Folger be present at the next discussion regarding this application.

Commissioner Pacekonis made a motion to table the discussion. Wilson seconded the motion.  The motion carried and the vote was unanimous.  

  • Appl 11-36P, Buckland Commons Site Plan – request for a change to the existing approval to allow a left hand turn heading southbound into the site for a limited timeframe (Exhibits B and C)
Ben Wheeler of Design Professionals presented the request.

There are two change orders to be discussed, and several people would like to make presentations. The first change order regards the approval of a right-in, right-out turn onto Buckland Road via a waver from the Traffic Management Regulations Access Management Regulations. Wheeler requested to have a left-hand turn into the site that was in the original site plan.

Eric Glitzski from Glitzski Associates also spoke for the requested left-hand turn. He is trying to lease the larger proposed building. Glitzski specializes in retail development and consulting. He has been doing business for 25 years in the area. He feels the left-hand turn is critical to this development. A customer would have to pass the building and drive to the first legal U-turn area near Buckland Hills mall and drive a mile back to access the center. The project is a key piece of development of the next 4-5 parcels. A right-in and right-out works, but without the left turn, he advised the developer not to proceed with the building. Without that building, there is concern with developing the bank, which would be an island. Tenants do not feel it would work without the left turn either. The leases would be 5 years, and if they had to live with a 5 year left turn in, they would hope to have additional development during that period. With 2 years, you can’t lease a property for two years after signing a 5 year lease and cut the access to them. Their business would not survive.

The Executive Vice President of Farmington Bank spoke in general about the site. Farmington Bank was established in 1851 and is interested in locating branch offices east of the river. Initially, they looked at South Windsor and few other sites. The South Windsor site will be a small bank office with no teller lines and no vaults. He stated without the left turn, their chances of coming to South Windsor are in jeopardy. South Windsor would be in the market area and will still support the Town even if the bank is moved to a nearby town. He likes the rear access to the site. Retail is critical to the bank success.

Wheeler said the left hand turn is the domino effect of this project. Without the turn, the viability of the two-story building comes into question. This property will be a catalyst for other developments on the Road. He received correspondence from Chief Reed, who would like to keep approval in place as was previously granted. He was not able to discuss the correspondence with the Chief because it was received late in the day. He understands the Chief’s concerns and insists traffic generated will not cause backups or delays. The left hand turn has a stipulation to be on a temporary basis. The original approval was also temporary.

Lipe read Chief Reed’s letter. (Exhibit C)

The Commission had questions and comments.

Commissioner Marrero agreed with the Chief. If the median in the road was extended all the way down to Deming Street, in your opinion, would the strip of land never be developed? Glitzski replied that there is no median strip and hasn’t been developed. It would not be developed and prime pieces would get developed.

Commissioner Marrero feels that there is enough exposure and agrees with the Chief request’s not to change the approval.  Glitzski replied that without the turn, the property is not leasable in today’s market. Wheeler also replied where the median is, only one retail property had been developed. There are constraints and development has been hampered to this point.

Commissioner Marrero said that the Town has a responsibility to the public have a safe road. Safety should not go below anything else.

Wheeler replied that he and Mr. Glitzski feel that it is a safe development, and that there is a safe stopping distance to make that left-hand maneuver.

Commissioner Foley said that traveling along Buckland Road, if you look at dentist office and flower shop, you still have to cross two lanes. The Police Department can’t determine whether it gets developed or not. The project should be approved with a condition of 5-7 years, and by then the access will be further up the road. Wheeler said the original approval has a connection from Deming Street. If it takes longer than 5-7 years, the left hand access will go away prior to that.

Foley requested to approve with a condition to allow development, since it has to start somewhere. Pacekonis replied that financial viability is not the concern of this Commission. He thinks it is a bad idea to go against access management so close to an intersection.

Commissioner Kennedy mentioned that as a traffic matter, there is left turn access southbound if you take a left into Deming Street and a right into the plaza. There was a meeting between myself, the applicants, the Bank, Michele Lipe, and Matt Galligan, Town Manager. Mr. Galligan suggested allowing the left turn for two years. The letter from Chief Reed reinforces that the instinct was right to begin with. This is a serious access management problem.

Commissioner Carroll mentioned that he travels a lot, and signs are used to direct traffic to the entrance of a particular building.

Commissioner Butter asked why the Commission would say 2 years for the turn instead of 5 years. Kennedy replied that it concerned the safety of that specific driveway and access management. There would be the impact of too many driveways along Buckland Road. The Chief’s letter talks more about access management.

Commissioner Pacekonis made a motion to deny the requested change. Marrero seconded the motion.  The motion carried and the vote was 5 -2; Kenney, Wilson, Pacekonis, Butter and Marrero voted in favor; Foley and Carroll opposed.

  • Appl 11-36P, Buckland Commons Site Plan – request for phasing of the project
Ben Wheeler of Design Professionals presented the request for the second change order.  

Wheeler requested permission to phase the project to allow bonding and construction in two separate phases. Buckland Commons would look to approval for two separate buildings. Phase line would be between the two parking bays. The first Phase would be on the north side, and the second Phase on the south side. Following is a list of what would be included:
  • Sanitary line extended to 2nd man hole
  • Water main extended up to Phase line including fire hydrant
  • Storm basin up to catch basin #4 on the southern side of the island
  • Pavement for 20 parking spaces, 6 spaces on Buckland Road side and 14 spaces on south side. 20 spaces are adequate to meet zoning requirements.
  • Dumpster location in Phase 2. They are proposing a temporary dumpster location.
  • Garage and watering trough onsite that would be removed as a part of Phase 1
  • Due to grading, a cut on the two-story building side of the site. The applicant would propose to strip the top soil from Phase 2 in order to move material over to Phase 1 and then replace and seed that portion of the site until that Phase were to be built
  • Lighting installed and landscaping would be done. Wetlands plants crosses phase line. All would be installed as part of phase one.
  • The sidewalk along Buckland Road would be extended to Phase line. That is part of the approval condition. The applicant was asked to contribute $7,500 for its improvement at the intersection. Improvements to Buckland side to be included in phase 1. The northern part is Phase 1 and the remainder as part of Phase 2.
The Commission had questions and comments.

Lipe clarified that it is a 5 year approval, and if Phase 1 were to be the only item completed, those other improvements would not be completed.

Commissioner Marrero asked if the right-in, right-out turns were included with Phase 1. Wheeler replied that the turns would be constructed during Phase 2.

Lipe mentioned typically they would look for sidewalk the entire length of the lot and asked if it would be a consideration to bond. Bruce Kelley replied that he would prefer not to do it that way. If approval lapsed, then phase 2 would be null and void and not constructed.

Commissioner Pacekonis asked if Kelley was unwilling to bond sidewalks, even though it is a requirement to have them along the whole frontage. Kelley replied that if he did not ask for phasing, the Town will not force him to build the building. They would force him to build Town improvements such as sidewalks. The whole point of phasing is to eliminate part of the sidewalk and sewer in phase 1.

Commissioner Butter asked if there was a difference in the way it is zoned and if sidewalks are required on Deming Street. Kelley replied that the plans only have the sidewalks on Buckland Road. Commissioner
Foley asked if there was a special dispensation to help promote development because of the financial burden on one person. The sidewalks could be left out of the picture with phasing. Commissioner Butter asked if it was possible to split the parcel into two lots. Lipe responded that it does not meet the minimum of 3 acres.

Commissioner Wilson said M&R makes a lot of money, and the corner is wide open. People will see it. It is safe for everyone to make their left at the light already at that intersection.

Commissioner Carroll made a motion to approve the phasing as proposed. Commissioner Butter seconded the motion.  The motion carried and the vote was unanimous.  

  • Appl 07-69P, Dzen Tree Farm Open Space Subdivision – request for changes to the Open Space Improvement Plan for Phase I Open Space being dedicated to the town (Exhibit D)
Rob Mannarino, developer of Dzen Farms Subdivision was present to discuss the change.

There are 19 acres of open space. They were required to clear the Christmas trees, till, and plant prairie grass. There was a proposal to the Planning Department to plant a meadow mix grass instead of prairie grass. He met with Ray Favreau, Jeff Folger, and Michele Lipe regarding a proposal to lease the land to a farmer. Favreau and John Caldwell agree that the developer and Town should entertain the change. They won’t have to mow, and a local farmer could lease and hay the property. It would still be open space property.
Lipe clarified that there is now a pathway and gravel road on the property. She read a memo from Folger with a provision that the hay should not be harvested until August 1st.
The Commissioners had questions and comments.

Commissioner Foley commented that farmers generally try to get between 2-3 cuts per year to make it worthwhile. Foley replied that 2-3 mowings per year is a minimum otherwise it would turn into a jungle.

Mannarino said that within one year, there were invasive trees growing on the property after he cleared his Christmas trees.

Commissioner Kennedy agreed with Foley regarding farming. It is important to preserve South Windsor’s rural farming heritage. South Windsor’s rural character is disappearing. Foley also mentioned that local farmers are losing all of their hay land to developing.

Commissioner Pacekonis asked how long the lease would be and who would get the money. Favreau responded that the leases are handled by Clay Major, Building Facilities Manager. The money would go to the general fund. The lease would have to go out to bid, and it would be between 3-5 years for the lease. Commissioner Foley recommended a 5 year lease to get viable crops.

Commissioner Pacekonis asked if there was parking on the property. Mannarino replied that there are 4 parking spaces as required.

Commissioner Pacekonis made a motion to approve a change in the requirements for improvements of the 19 acres of Open Space in Phase I to allow a farming use. Carroll seconded the motion.  The motion passed unanimously.

  • Discussion regarding proposed zoning and subdivision text amendments (Exhibit E)
Lipe explained the proposed changes to the Office Conversion Overlay Zone and Sign Regulations.  

Lipe explained the new bonding law. Changes to this new law are being revised. Before regulations are changed, the Commission may want to wait to see if the law changes again.

It was the consensus of the Commission to send these proposals to public hearing.

  • Discussion/adoption of updated Surety Policy (Exhibit F)
Commissioner Butter asked if there was a need to make the change to the policy right now and what the deadline is. Kennedy explained that this is not a change to regulations, but it is the preferred way to deal with Surety Bonds.

Commissioner Carroll made a motion to adopt the surety policy as proposed. Wilson seconded the motion.  The motion carried and the vote was unanimous.  

BONDS: None

MINUTES:  1/31/12, 2/7/12 and 2/14/12 were adopted by consensus with minor modifications.

OTHER BUSINESS: None

CORRESPONDENCE/REPORTS: Chairman Kennedy reminded the members of the upcoming CT Federation Dinner to be held on 3/17/12.  Anyone interested in attending should contact the Planning Department by Friday 3/1/12.  

ADJOURNMENT:
Pacekonis made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 9:55 PM.  Marrero seconded the motion. The motion carried and the vote was unanimous.  

Respectfully Submitted:


Michele Lipe
Town Planner